LL.B. (Hons)	The University of Hong Kong	1984
P.C.LL.	The University of Hong Kong	1985

Judicial Experience and Public Services

Deputy High Court Judge	2002
Deputy District Court Judge	1999
Member of the Election Committee as a Representative of the Legal Subsector responsible for electing the Chief Executive	2000-2005
Member of the Election Committee responsible for electing the Hong Kong Deputies to the National People’s Congress of PRC	Since 2008
Member of the Criminal Court Users Committee	2003-2017
Member of the Committee on the Consultancy Study on the Demand for and Supply of Legal and Related Services	2005-2008
Member of the Council of Duty Lawyer Service	1997-2002
Honorary Consultant to the Society of Rehabilitation and Crime Prevention, Hong Kong (Mock Trial Justice Education Project)	since 2008

Services for the Hong Kong Bar Association

Member of the Bar Council	1997-2002
Member of the Special Committee on Criminal Law and Procedure	1997-2002
Member of the Special Committee on Discipline	1997-2002
Member of the Special Committee on Overseas Counsel’s Admission	since 2008

MK is a bilingual criminal silk who was appointed as a Senior Counsel at the age of 39 in 2001. He founded the Wong Man Kit SC’s Chambers in 2010 and has been the Head of Chambers since then. MK specializes in both trials and appeals in criminal cases (both in English and in Chinese) in all levels of courts, with extensive experience in serious and complex white collar crimes such as money laundering , ICAC and CCB cases, corruption, misconduct in public office, commercial frauds, crimes involving listed companies, securities related cases, and false accounting. MK’s experience also covers a great variety of other cases like homicide, sexual offences, trafficking in dangerous drugs, coroner’s inquest, and many others.

MK defended and advised in a number of high profile cases involving well-known individuals. MK has also prosecuted cases for the HKSAR and given advices to the DOJ. MK sat as a Deputy High Court Judge in 2002, and as a Deputy District Court Judge in 1999, hearing mainly criminal cases. MK’s practice also includes giving advices to clients during investigation stages before criminal charges are laid.

Fluent in Cantonese and English
Can communicate in Putonghua

Update of Recent Cases

1. HKSAR v. Yau Shing Kin (邱承建) D1, Chu Tung Ki Aaron (朱東麒) D2 and Chu Tung Hang Byron (朱東恆) D3
This complicated trial took more than 80 working days in the District Court in 2020 to finish. It involves 3 medical eye specialists (ophthalmologists) formerly employed by the Caritas Hospital. They were charged with a number of offences of conspiracy to commit misconduct in public office. D1 also faced a charge of theft of medicine from the hospital. The prosecution alleged that the Defendants recommended private doctors to the patients while they were acting in the capacity of a public sector doctor, which involved conflict of interest. Complex factual and legal issues were central to this case, including the evidence of a prosecution witness giving evidence under immunity, the validity or otherwise of search warrants of the Defendant’s computer and smart phones, intrusion into the constitutional privacy rights of the Defendants, the appropriateness and interpretation of guidelines issued by the Hospital Authority on the recommendation of private doctors to patients by the public sector doctors, what would constitute conflict of interest, the admissibility of the covert recording of the Defendant’s meeting and conversations by the ICAC, and the legal elements of the offence of misconduct in public office. MK represented D1 Dr. Yau Shing Kin, and led the defence in the lengthy trial. MK conducted extensive cross examination of the prosecution witness giving evidence under immunity, the Hospital Authority prosecution witnesses, and the patients prosecution witnesses. All 3 Defendants gave evidence on the special issue and general issues. MK did a through written and oral closing submissions covering every material factual and legal issue. In the end, all the Defendants were found not guilty and acquitted of all the charges.

 

2. HKSAR v. Yeoh Kim Loong Eugene (楊金隆) (D1) and Lum Chor Wah Richard (林楚華) (D2)
MK represented D1 in this District Court trial. D1 was the Senior Vice President of the Initial Public Offering (IPO) team in the Listing Department of the Hong Kong Stock Exchange, responsible for vetting all listing applications. D1 was charged with: (1) Conspiracy to offer advantages to a public servant, i.e. D1, advantages of a favour from D2 by D2 acting as a supporting member in D1’s application for Jockey Club Racing Membership, and a gift of $9.5m from D2, for D1 being favourally disposed to the IPO applications in which D2 was involved, and (2) Misconduct in public office, namely that D1 failed to disclose his conflict of interest with D2 in relation to the aforesaid two advantages offered by D2 and D1 failed to abstain from the deliberation and decision making in respect of the IPO applications.

MK did a thorough cross examination of the HK Stock Exchange and Jockey Club prosecution witnesses and brough out evidence relevant for the defence. D1 elected not to give evidence in Court, but called his wife to give evidence to explain clearly that the $9.15m were for innocent purposes. MK made a systemic and detailed written and oral closing submission analyzing the factual and legal issues including the submission that there was no conflict of interest involved, and there was no element of corruption. After the trial which took about 20 working days, the court found that the defence may be true, and that the Defendants were not guilty, and the Defendants were acquitted of all charges.

 

3. Lam Ching Sheung (林徵嫦) v. Ching Lin Chuen (程練傳) (STS 5870-5879 of 2021)
Ms Lam Ching Sheung initiated a private prosecution against the Defendant for 10 charges of theft, alleging that the Defendant in 1994 to 1995 misrepresented to Ms Lam that a certain company owned a certain land lot in Tai Po, cheating Ms Lam into investing $8.7 million into a small hosue construction project. MK represented the Defendant. MK cross-examined Ms Lam on her previous reports to the police, her previous act versions in the relevant civil actions, and the improper conduct of Ms Lam in claiming against the Defendant in the Court documents, and the special features involved in small house development projects. The Defendant elected not to give evidence in Court. The Court agreed with MK’s detailed closing submission, and importantly accepted MK’s core submission that Ms Lam’s evidence under cross examination was “appalling” (「慘不忍睹」), which did not have any credibility at all. As a result, the court found the Defendant not guilty of all charges, and awarded cost to the defence with a certificate for 2 counsel including a Senior Counsel.

 

4. HKSAR v 鄧皓文 (Tang Ho Man) A1 張志旺 (Cheung Chi Wong) A2 (CACC 40/2017, [2021]) HKCA 167)
MK represented A2 in the Court of Appeal in appeal against conviction of the offence of trafficking in dangerous drugs. The Court of Appeal accepted MK’s submission that the trial judge failed to direct the jury that if the jury found that the police officer has done oppressive act on the Defendant in making him confess, then although the confession is true, the jury must still totally ignore the confession. Since the trial judge failed to do so, the appeal was allowed, the conviction was quashed, and a retrial was ordered.

 

5. HKSAR v 江昊嶸 A1, 羅少韓A2, 林泉漢A3
MK represented the 3 Appellants in a appeal against conviction of the offence of acting as an triad member. The Court of First Instance accepted MK’s submission that the trial Magistrate did not properly deal with the identification evidence against A1, and allowed his appeal and quashed his conviction. The appeal by A2, A3 were dismissed.

 

6. HKSAR v Lau Chun Ting (劉俊霆) (HCMA 267/2013, [2021] HKCFI 219)
MK represented the Appellant in on appeal against conviction of the offence of indecent assault. The Appellant was the employer and friend of the alleged victim. The Court of First Instance accepted MK’s argument that the trial Magistrate did not properly deal with the evidence of the alleged victim and an independent defence witness, and found that the conviction was unsafe. The appeal was allowed and the conviction was quashed.

 

7. HKSAR v Yeung Lai Ping (楊麗萍) (HCMA 251/2018, [2019] HKCFI 914)
MK represented the Appellant in an appeal against conviction of 2 offences of assault. The prosecution alleged that the Defendant assaulted his employee maid. The Court of First Instance accepted MK’s submission that (1) the trial Magistrate erroneously treated certain evidence as corroboration evidence and relied on it to convict; (2) the Magistrate did not adequately consider the (discrepancies) and illogical aspect of the alleged victim’s own evidence and those of the other witnesses. As a result, the Court of First Instance found that the convictions was usage, allowed the appeal and quashed the convictions.

 

8. 香港特別行政區 訴 高永雄 HCMA 35/2022. [2022] HKCFI 3275
MK represented the Appellant in the Magistracy Appeal in the Court of First Instance against the conviction of two charges of indecent assault. The Appellant was the employer of a domestic helper, who claimed to be indecently assaulted by the Appellant at his home on two occasions. The Court of First Instance accepted the following submissions of MK: (1) The Magistrate erroneously found that the complainant made a recent complaint (2) The Magistrate erroneously relied on the evidence of the Appellant’s bad character and propensity to commit crimes (3) The Magistrate did not properly consider the grave contradictions and inherent improbabilities of the complainant’s evidence. The appeal was allowed and all the convictions were quashed. The Court also awarded the cost of the Appeal to the Appellant.

Previous Notable cases

1. Yan Sui Ling (嚴穗陵) v. HKSAR (2012) 15 HKCFAR 146
Madam Yan Sui Ling was convicted of a charge of money laundering in the District Court when she was defended by another Senior Counsel. MK conducted the appeal against conviction for the Defendant in the Court of Appeal against conviction. The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal. MK conducted the Defendant’s appeal to the Court of Final Appeal, and leave to appeal was granted on the limb of substantial and grave injustice. The Court of Final Appeal accepted MK’s submissions and quashed lay client’s conviction of money laundering. The case involved an issue of the impact of underground banking system in the mainland China on money laundering offences in Hong Kong, and whether the trial judge and the Court of Appeal had a wrong assessment of the evidence.

 

2. HKSAR v. Ye Fang and Another
(DCCC 1022/2012, CACC 299/2014)
MK defended Madam Ye Fang in a District Court trial who was charged with money laundering involving over $200m. The prosecution alleged that Madam Ye’s bank account transactions were inconsistent with her income. In the lengthy and complicated trial, the defence called a number of witnesses and produced bundles of documents to explain the transactions. Lay client was convicted after trial. MK conducted the appeal in the Court of Appeal (being led by a London silk), and the appeal involved the application of the legal principles in money laundering cases arising from the Court of Final Appeal judgment in the case of Pang Hung Fai. The appeal was allowed, the conviction was quashed, and a retrial was ordered. Madam Ye was acquitted in the retrial in the District Court. MK did not conduct the retrial.

 

3. HKSAR v. Shum Kin Wing (沈建榮) and Another. (DCCC 175/2013, CACC 437/2013)
The Defendants were charged in the District Court with money laundering offences based on their bank account transactions and their tax returns. MK conducted their defence in this lengthy and complicated trial. The defence called many witnesses and produced a lot of documents to explain the bank account transactions. The Defendants were convicted after trial. MK conducted the appeal in the Court of Appeal and the convictions of both Defendants were quashed, and no retrial was ordered. The issues involved law points arising from the Court of Final Appeal case of Pang Hung Fai and whether the trial judge erred in the findings of facts.

 

4. HKSAR v. Cheung Hiu Kwong (張曉光) HCMA 24/2014
MK conducted the appeal in the Court of First Instance for the appellant against the conviction of money laundering charges and no retrial was ordered. It involved law points arising from the Court of Final Appeal judgement in Pang Hung Fai.

 

5. HKSAR v. Yeung Ka Sing Carson (楊家誠) CACC 101/2014
MK drafted the perfected grounds of appeal for Carson Yeung in the appeal to the Court of Appeal before the Court of Final Appeal judgement in Pang Hung Fai was released, and conducted the first bail pending appeal application which was adjourned. MK had no further involvement in this case afterwards.

 

6. HKSAR v. 楊思慨 DCCC 208/2013
MK conducted the defence in a money laundering trial for the Defendant in the District Court, who was a businessman involved in unlicensed currency exchange transactions of tens of millions of dollars. He was convicted after trial. The appeal was taken up by another counsel.

 

7. Appeals in the Court of Final Appeal
MK conducted a number of appeals for the Defendants to apply for leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal on various criminal charges. In the following cases, the appeals reached the full Court of Final Appeal:-

(I) Leung Chi Keung v. HKSAR (2004) HKCFAR 526
MK conducted a Magistracy Appeal against an indecent assault conviction, which was dismissed. MK obtained leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal. Leave to appeal was granted, inter alia, on a point of law of great and general importance on the evidence of distress in sexual cases. In the appeal, MK assisted the Court of Final Appeal to formulate a direction to the jury when the issue of evidence of distress of the victim is involved in a case of sexual offences.

(II) HKSAR v. Lam Sze Nga (2006) HKCFAR 162
MK conducted the successful appeal by the Defendant against a conviction of trafficking in dangerous drugs in the Court of Appeal and the conviction was quashed and a retrial was ordered. The DOJ appealed to the Court of Final Appeal on a point of law of great and general importance on the issue of the defendant’s right of silence. MK conducted the Defendant’s case in the Court of Final Appeal and succeeded in resisting the DOJ’s appeal. The Defendant’s conviction of the offence of trafficking in dangerous drugs stood quashed in the Court of Final Appeal.

(III) Ko Man Chun v. HKSAR (2010) 13 HKCFAR 123
MK conducted an appeal to the Court of First Instance and then to the Court of Final Appeal against a conviction of acting as a member of a triad society. MK argued that there was a mistaken finding of fact by both the Magistrate and the Court of First Instance. The Court of Final Appeal allowed the appeal against conviction on the limb on substantial and grave injustice based on MK’s argument.

(IV) Yan Sui Ling (嚴穗陵) v. HKSAR (2012) 15 HKCFAR 146
This case has been referred to hereinbefore.

(V) HKSAR v. CT FACC No 25 of 2018 [2019] HKCFA 26
MK represented the Appellant who was convicted by the jury of 4 counts of rape but was acquitted of the 5th count of rape. MK made extensive submission in respect of 2 points of law of great and general importance on (1) how should the trial judge direct the jury in case of sexual offences where the only direct evidence of the commission of the offences came from the complainant , and (2) what should be the proper approach of an appellate court towards inconsistent verdicts which were based on the uncorroborated evidence of the complainant. Although the appeal was dismissed , the Court of Final Appeal made clarifications on 2 important points of law with the assistance of MK.

 

8. HKSAR v. Wong Kwan (黃坤), Lew Mun-hung (劉夢熊), Yik Siu Hung and Another HCCC 561/2013
MK defended Madam Yik Siu Hung in the complicated and lengthy High Court jury trial of conspiracy to defraud and money laundering, which involved the purchase of an overseas oilfield by the listed company Pearl Oriental. Stay application and listing rules were some of the relevant issues. Lay client was convicted after trial.

 

9. HKSAR v. Wong Ying Ho Kennedy (黃英豪) and others (HCCC 409/2015, now DCCC 190/2017)
MK acted for Kennedy Wong Ying Ho (the former chairman of a listed company and a member of the Political Consultative Conference of the PRC) who was charged with 2 bribery offences. The trial was to take place before a jury in the High Court in February 2017 for 30 working days. The High Court transferred it to the District Court for a 40 days trial. Mr. Kennedy Wong was acquitted in the District Court trial. MK represented Mr. Kennedy Wong in the Magistrates Court and the High Court, but did not conduct the District Court trial.

 

10. HKSAR v. Chow Heung-wing, Stephen and 2 others (HCCC 437/2015)
MK acted for Mr. Chow Heung-wing Stephen, who is alleged to be the owner and person in effective control of the companies in the “DR Group”. The Defendant is accused of manslaughter by gross negligence in relation to the death of a person after a procedure involving a cellular product was performed on the deceased. This complicated and lengthy trial was heard in the Court of First Instance before a jury, which lasted for 120 court hearing days. It began in May 2017 and finished in Dec 2017. Mr. Chow was convicted and was sentenced to 12 years of imprisonment. It involved numerous complicated medical experts’ evidence, and the issue of elements of the manslaugther offence.

 

11. HKSAR v. Chan Chun Chuen (陳振聰) (HCCC 182/2012)
MK acted for Chan Chun Chuen in his forged will criminal case in the High Court at a certain stage and made certain applications for him.

 

12. HKSAR v. Koon Wing Yee (官永義), Sham Man Keung and others (HCCC 66/2010)
Koon Wing Yee and his co-Defendants were charged with blackmailing Hui Chi Ming over a money dispute involving the shares of a listed company and possession of firearms. MK acted for one of the co-Defendants Sham Man Keung in the High Court jury trial. All the Defendants were acquitted after trial.

 

13. HKSAR v. Yip Kim Po (葉劍波) & Another HCCC 67 & 188/2008
MK defended Yip Kim Po, the chairman of 2 listed companies in a High Court lengthy and complicated jury trial. The jury returned a verdict of Not Guilty on all the 3 charges of commercial fraud after trial and the client was acquitted completely in this case. It involved complicated experts’ evidence on money flow and whether there were false commercial transactions.

 

14. HKSAR v. Yip Wan Fung & Others DCCC 960/2007 & 551/2008
MK defended Yip Wan Fung, the sister of Yip Kim Po (葉劍波) in a lengthy and complicated case of commercial fraud and money laundering involving a listed company which ran over 80 working days in the District Court. Lay Client was convicted after trial. Other counsel took up the appeals in the Court of Appeal and the Court of Final Appeal, which were dismissed.

 

15. HKSAR v. Hu Jia Hua (2004)
MK defended in the District Court in an ICAC case in which corruption charges were laid against Hu Jia Hua, the vice-chairman of the Nanyang Tabacco Co., a subsidiary of the listed company Shanghai Industrial Ltd. The cautioned statement was ruled inadmissible and all charges were dismissed by the trial judge and lay client was acquitted completely.

 

16. HKSAR v. Lu Da Yong and others (2005-2008)
MK defended Lu Da Yong, the chairman of the aforesaid Nangyang Tobacco Co. who was charged with corruption and conspiracy to defraud in the District Court. The complicated trial went on for several months over 2 years. It involved a stay application based on infringement of legal professional privilege. Lay client became absent in the middle of the trial.

 

17. Secretary For Justice v. Chan Chi Wan Stephen (陳志雲) (R1) and Tsang Pei Kun (叢培崑) (R2) CACC 355 of 2011 and CACC 103 of 2012
MK represented R2 in the TVB employee corruption case. The prosecution appealed against the Defendants’ first acquittal in the District Court and the appeal was heard in November 2012 (The first appeal). The Court of Appeal quashed the acquittal and ordered a resumption of trial in the District Court. In the resumed trial in the District Court, the Defendants were again acquitted (the 2nd acquittal). MK represented R2 in the first appeal in the Court of Appeal and the resumed trial in the District Court. MK had no further involvement in this case since the 2nd acquittal. Both R1’s and R2’s convictions were finally quashed by the Court of Final Appeal in March 2017. The Court of Final Appeal confirmed that MK’s argument in the first appeal in the Court of Appeal that the prosecution has to prove that the agent’s act was detrimental to the principal’s interest was correct.

 

18. HKSAR v. Chan Kar Leung & Others (2004-2006)
MK defended Chan Kar Leung, the chairman of a listed company in a High Court jury trial. The defendant was charged with LC frauds and false accounting. The trial went on for about 2 months. Lay client was convicted after trial. MK represented the client in his appeal in the Court of Appeal. The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal and MK advised the client to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal. His appeal against conviction was finally allowed in the Court of Final Appeal. (The Court of Final Appeal case was done by another Senior Counsel).

 

19. HKSAR v. John Wong (DCCC 694/2011)
MK prosecuted on fiat in an ICAC investigated case against the former Head of the Department of Surgery of the Hong Kong University. The Defendant was convicted of 2 counts of false accounting and 2 counts of misconduct in public office after trial in the District Court.

 

20. HKSAR v. Kan Ping Chee Brian (簡炳墀) (HCMA 48/2012, FAMC 64/2012)
The former multiple Champion Horse Trainer Kan Ping Chee was convicted of an election offence when he was represented by another Senior Counsel in the trial. M.K. took up the appeal and argued his appeal in the High Court and the Court of Final Appeal. His appeals were dismissed.

 

21. MK defended many other ICAC investigated corruption and fraud charges in both the private and public sectors. In the following trials, all the Defendants were acquitted of all the charges after trial:-

(i) HKSAR v. Li Ling Sau and Another (KCCC 3688/2014)
The Defendant was the principal of a well-known kindergarten who was charged with accepting bribes from a parent of a student.

(ii) HKSAR v. Law Ying Mo (2006)
(iii) HKSAR v. Cheung Yin Ming (2006)
(iv) HKSAR v. Kan Kwok Leung and others (2006)
(v) HKSAR v. Lau Chin Pang and Another (2008)
(vi) HKSAR v. Lo Kwai Wing (2008)
(vii) HKSAR v. Liu Tin Luk (2004)
(viii) HKSAR v. Chan Chi Man and Another (2002)
(ix) HKSAR v. Tam Tak Lung KCCC 2393/2011

 

22. DCCC 647/2001 (2002)
MK defended one of the Defendants in the District Court case, in which his client and a dentist were charged by the ICAC for defrauding the Yan Chai group of hospitals. The client was acquitted of all charges after trial.

 

23. MK has advised well-known clients in commercial crimes and corruption cases whose names cannot be disclosed for confidentiality reasons. For example, MK advised one of the persons under arrest by the ICAC in relation to the case of misconduct in public office involving the former Chief Secretary Rafael Hui Si-yan (許仕仁).

 

24. HKSAR v. Ho Tsan Lam HCCC 322/2011
MK defended a defendant charged with a serious case of drug trafficking in the High Court. The Defendant was acquitted after trial in which the cautioned statement was ruled inadmissible after a voir dire.

 

25. HKSAR v. Ho Kam Kau DCCC 989/2011
MK defended a money laundering case in the District Court. The Defendant was acquitted after trial.

 

26. HKSAR v. Chan Siu & Others (2007)
MK defended all the Defendants (who belonged to the same family) in a District Court trial, who were charged with copyright offences and money laundering. All Defendants were acquitted of all the charges after a trial which lasted for more than a month.

 

27. HKSAR v. Ip Man Man (2003)
MK defended the chairman of a listed company in a District Court case who was charged with stealing money from his own company. The Defendant was acquitted after trial.

 

28. HKSAR v. Yuan Gui Ying DCCC 260/2010
MK defended a money laundering case involving experts’ evidence on money laundering. Lay client was convicted after trial.

 

29. HKSAR v. Lee wing Kan and others (2006)
MK defended the chairman of a listed company who was charged with conspiracy to defraud (LC frauds). The trial went on for about 2 months in the District Court. The client was convicted after trial.

 

30. HKSAR v. Agnes Wong Kin Yee (2008)
MK defended in the District Court the 4th generation owner of Wong Lo Kut Herbal Tea who was charged with false accounting by the ICAC. Lay client was convicted after trial.

 

31. HKSAR v. Law Kam Fai (2005)
MK defended in the District Court the chairman of a rural committee and a member of the Election Committee who was charged with conspiracy to steal the rocks of the Tung Chung River. The trial lasted for about 2 months. Lay client was convicted after trial.

 

32. MK represented Christie Wo Man Shan, owner of the watch brand Philip Stein, in the Insider Dealing Tribunal inquiry into the trading of shares in Vanda Systems and Communications Holding Ltd. (2005-2006) The case went on for several months over 2 years.

 

33. HKSAR v. Wong Kwai Keung (2001)
MK defended the brother of Wong Kwai Fun in a bookmaking case in the District Court. The Defendant was convicted after trial.

 

34. HKSAR v. Law Kam Fat (2001)
MK was able to stay the prosecution in the High Court trial in a drug trafficking case on the ground that evidence in favour of the defence had become unavailable because of the lapse of time. Lay client was released from custody immediately afterwards.

 

35. HKSAR v. Lau Tung Ping (2005)
MK defended the former goal-keeper of the HK Soccer Team who was charged with rape in the High Court. Subsequently, the client’s conviction was quashed on appeal in the Court of Appeal.(The appeal was done by another Senior Counsel).

 

36. HKSAR v. Tsang Chung Chim (2005)
MK defended a police senior inspector who was charged with bookmaking and money laundering. Lay client was convicted after trial.

 

37. Ada Siu Yin Law v. Lo Hung Kwan (1999) [WSS8498-7/1999]
In a private prosecution, MK (being led by a Queen’s Counsel) acted for the Defendant Lo Hung Kwan, who was charged with forging a will. The Magistrate granted MK’s application to stay the prosecution on the grounds, inter alia, of delay of prosecution and the ulterior motive of the prosecutor.

 

38. Application for a summons of private prosecution against Madam Chan Sock Fun (陳淑芬) ESMP 9236/2016
MK represented Madam Chan Sock Fun (陳淑芬), the former organizer of Jacky Cheung’s concerts, in resistance to an application for a summons of private prosecution for conspiracy to defraud against Madam Chan. The application was dismissed by the Magistrate for lack of merits.

 

39. HKSAR v. Tang Kin Kwong CACC 488/2002
On invitation by the judiciary, MK acted as amicus curiae to assist the Court of Appeal in a murder appeal on an important point of law.

 

40. MK has represented medical doctors in death inquests in the coroner’s court in cases involving the death of patients after surgical operations.

 

41. HKSAR v. 孫家強 (Suen Ka Keung) KTCC 3302/2011
The defendant was an osteopathic physician (bone–setter), who was charged with indecent assault against a female TV celebrity in the course of the defendant’s treatment of her. MK successfully conducted the defence for him and the defendant was acquitted after trial.

 

42. Appeals in the Court of Appeal and the Court of First Instance
MK has conducted numerous appeals against convictions and sentences in the Court of Appeal and the Court of First instance apart from the cases mentioned above. In the following cases, the appeals against convictions were allowed and the convictions were quashed:-

(1) HKSAR v. Chan Pun Chung (陳濱松) and Tang Yan Leung (鄧恩亮)
CACC 229/2014
[Charge: blackmail]

(2) HKSAR v. 何濟綱
HCMA 328/2014
[Charge: indecent assault]

(3) HKSAR v. 溫日文
HCMA 67/2014
[Charge: indecent assault]

(4) HKSAR v. 區炳威
HCMA 754/2012
[Charge: fraud]

(5) HKSAR v. 許育彬
HCMA 203/2012
[Charge: indecent assault]

(6) HKSAR v. 岑仲樑
HCMA 8/2012
[Charge: indecent assault]

(7) HKSAR v. 王孟順
HCMA 852/2011
[Charge: indecent assault]

(8) HKSAR v. 張志聰
HCMA 744/2011
[Charge: dangerous driving causing grievous bodily harm; the conviction was reduced to careless driving]

(9) HKSAR v. 朱振偉
HCMA 485/2011
[Charge: assaulting and resisting police officer]

(10) HKSAR v.曾永祥
HCMA 133/2011
[Charges: indecent assault and others]

(11) HKSAR v. 盧小江 and 盧小雄
HCMA 152/2011
[Charges: offences against the Estate Agent Ordinance]

(12) HKSAR v. Tsang Sui Cheung 曾瑞祥
CACC 102/2010
[Charge: attempted robbery]

(13) HKSAR v. 周發強
HCMA 718/2010
[Charge: indecent assault]

(14) HKSAR v. 楊鴻基 and others
HCMA 210/2010
[Charge: assault occasioning actual bodily harm]

(15) HKSAR v. 邱穎思 and Another
HCMA 789/2009
[Charge: an offence against the Trade Description Ordinance]

(16) HKSAR v. 潘志明
CACC 213/2008
[Charge: conspiracy to defraud]

(17) HKSAR v. 薛科斯
HCMA 635/2008
[Charge: indecent assault]

(18) HKSAR v. 江靜茹
HCMA 347/2008
[Charge: assault occasioning actual bodily harm]

(19) HKSAR v. 徐杏村
HCMA 1216/2007
[Charge: indecent assault]

(20) HKSAR v. Wong Shuk Fong
HCMA 1225/2007
[Charge: employing a person not lawfully employable]

(21) HKSAR v. Chau Hon Kwong
CACC453/2006
[Charge: trafficking in dangerous drugs]

(22) HKSAR v. 陳永權
HCMA 1081/2006
[Charge: conspiracy to accept a bribery]

(23) HKSAR v. 蔡有成
HCMA 546/2006
[Charge: gaining access to a computer with dishonest intent]

(24) HKSAR v. Jarhia Kuldeep Singh
CACC 96/2006
[Charge: trafficking in dangerous drugs]

(25) HKSAR v. Lee Ka Ming and others
HCMA 223/2006
[Charge: assisting in the management of a vice establishment]

(26) HKSAR v. 陳永賢
HCMA 209/2006
[Charge: indecent assault]

(27) HKSAR v. Lee Shing Hung
HCMA 903/2005
[Charge: offences under the Theft Ordinance]

(28) HKSAR v. 江潤球
CACC 197/2004
[Charges: bookmaking and money laundering]

(29) HKSAR v. Li Chun Ming
CACC 32/2003
[Charge: detaining forcibly a person with intent to procure a ransom for his liberation]

(30) HKSAR v. Chau Hon Kwong
CACC 234/2004
[Charges: trafficking in dangerous drugs]

(31) HKSAR v. 吳永光
HCMA 351/2004
[Charge: assault occasioning actual bodily harm]

(32) HKSAR v. 賴文財 and 吳瑞麟
CACC 628/2002
[Charge: assault with intent to rob]

(33) HKSAR v. Au Koon Yip and Others
CACC 168/2003
[Charge: wounding with intent]

(34) HKSAR v. 何瑞洪 and others
HCMA 339/2003
[Charge: attempt to pervert the course of justice]

(35) HKSAR v. 李志強
HCMA 259/2003
[Charge: indecent assault]

(36) HKSAR v. 戴曉東
HCMA 272/2003
[Charge: disorderly conduct in public place]

(37) HKSAR v. 羅兆麒
HCMA 53/2003
[Charge: indecent assault]

(38) HKSAR v. 郭惠紅
CACC 161/2001
[Charge: trafficking in dangerous drugs]

(39) HKSAR v. 趙鳳絹 and 嚴之成
CACC 475/2001
[Charge: trafficking in dangerous drugs]

(40) HKSAR v. Lam Chiu Chuen and others
HCMA 288/2002
[Charge: conspiracy to defraud]

(41) HKSAR v. Fan Wai Kit
HCMA 33/2002
[Charge: indecent assault]

(42) HKSAR v. Sung Siu Kam
HCMA 1221/2001
[Charge: theft]

(43) HKSAR v. 張偉逢 and others
HCMA 37/2001
[Charges: assaulting and resisting police offices]

(44) HKSAR v. Cheng Chung Ming
HCMA 210/2000
[Charges: false accounting]

(45) HKSAR v. Tsang Tat Yan and others
CACC 262/1998
[Charges: evasion of liability by deception]
(After the conviction was quashed by the Court of Appeal, the prosecution charged the Defendant with another offence based on substantially the same facts. The District Council Judge granted MK’s application for stay of the prosecution in the 2nd District Court trial).

(46) HKSAR v. Lee Yan Wing and Another
CACC 176/1993
[Charges: robbery and possession of offensive weapons]

(47) HKSAR v. Lui Tak Fai
HCMA 195/1991
[Charge: indecent assault]

 

43. The Seven Policemen Case (7警上訴案)

HKSAR v. Pak Wing-bun (A3) and others CACC 38/2017

MK is acting for Police Sergeant Pak Wing-bun in the 7 policemen’s appeal (7警上訴案) in which the 7 policemen defendants were convicted in the District Court of assaulting the protester Tsang Kin Chiu in the Occupy Central Incident and were sentenced to 2 years of imprisonment. MK got bail pending appeal for A3 in the Court of Appeal and conducted the appeal against conviction and sentence for him, which took 3 days of hearing. A3’s appeal against convictions was dismissed, but his appeal against sentence was allowed with a reduction of the sentence by a few months.

Money Laundering
(see Notable cases 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 25, 26, 28, 36, 42(28).

Corruption, Commercial frauds, and ICAC investigated Cases
(see Notable cases 8, 9, 11, 13-23, 27, 29-31, 42(1, 4, 11, 15, 16, 22, 27, 40, 42, 44, 45).

Appeals
(see Notable cases 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 17, 20, 42).

High Court Trials
(see Notable cases 8, 10, 11, 12, 13, 18, 24, 35, 36).

Sexual Offences
(see Notable cases 7, 35, 41, 42 (2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 10, 13, 17, 19, 25, 26, 35, 37, 41, 47).

Trafficking in dangerous drugs
(see Notable cases 7, 24, 34, 42(21, 24, 30, 38, 39).

Bookmaking
(see Notable cases 33, 36, 42(28).

Homicide and Coroner’s inquest
(see Notable cases 10, 39, 40).

Copyright Offences
(see Notable case 26).

Insider Dealing
(see Notable case 32).

Private Prosecution
(see Notable cases 37, 38).

Commercial Crimes

General Crimes

P.C.LL.	City University of Hong Kong	1993 – 1994
LL.B.	City University of Hong Kong	1990 – 1993
	Birmingham City University	1988 – 1990

Private Practice at Lawrence Lok S.C, Q.C.’s Chambers	1994-1998
Vice President of Oriental Press Group (Company Secretary, Publisher of various magazines and websites, Legal Department, I.T. Department, etc.)	1998-2005
Radar Company Limited (Family Business of 58 years history)	2005-2010
Private Practice at M.K. Wong S.C.’s Chambers	2010-present

Appearing as advocate in different levels of Court in Hong Kong for both civil and criminal matters. At the same time engaged in advisory works regularly.

Fluent in Cantonese and English.

Some knowledge of Putonghua.

Criminal Law

                                                                    

(White collar crimes involving ICAC and CCB investigations, Restraint Orders, Legal Professional Privilege, Sexual Offenses, Mental Health cases, Immigration cases, Industrial summons)

 

• Secretary For Justice v Chan Chi Wan Stephen (R1) and Tsang Pei Kun (R2) [CA355/2011 and CA103/2012]

• Representing R2 in the TVB related ICAC investigation case at Court of Appeal (Led by Mr. MK Wong SC)

 

• Secretary For Justice v Chan Chi Wan Stephen (R1) and Tsang Pei Kun (R2) [DCCC1214/2010]

• Representing R2 at the resumed trial at District Court (Led by Mr. MK Wong SC)

 

• HKSAR v Wong Kin Yee Agnes [CACC9/2009]

• Appeal on conviction of LC Fraud (Led by Mr. MK Wong SC)

 

• In the Matter of YIK Siu-hung (R3) & others [HCMP2598/2013]

• Representing Ms. Yik in the recent Wong Kwan and Lew Mon-hung High Court Fraud case for variation of the property restraint orders

 

• Re: A Listed Company in foreign dairy business

• Represented client to prevent privileged documents from reviewing by ICAC.

 

• HKSAR v Eric Tsang [HCMA133/2011]

• Successful appeal on conviction of sexual offences (Led by Mr. MK Wong SC)

 

• HKSAR v Dr. Suen [KTCC3302/2011]

• Defended client in a charge of indecent assault involving a TV celebrity (Led by Mr. MK Wong SC)

 

 

• HKSAR v R. Wong [TMCC2422/2010]

• Defended client (a successful businessman working for a consulate) in a charge of indecent assault took place in public transportations.

 

• HKSAR v A. Au-yeung [KTCC875/2015]

• Defended client in a commercial fraud and deception trial of 10 days.

 

• HKSAR v W.M. Ho [DCCC417/2015]

• Defended client in a serious wounding case with a plead of insanity under Mental Health Ordinance

 

• HKSAR v J. CAI [ESCC2417/2016]

• Defended client (a successful businessman in IT field) in a charge of indecent assault (Led by Mr. MK Wong SC)

 

• Defended various principal contractors in a vast number of industrial summonses (SOGO, Unistress, REC Engineering, Nixon Technology, Kwan On Construction, Wing Ming Constructions, Joint Effort Engineering, New Hopes Construction, Yau Lee Construction, etc.)

 

• Represented a large local logistic company in a matter involving its foreign employees

 

• Represented a famous franchised Taiwanese restaurant with foreign employees working in HK.

 

• Represented the chairman of a HK listed PRC company in a matter with the Immigration Department (Led by Mr. Lawrence Lok SC)

 

• Advised and represented clients (both corporate and individuals) in commercial crimes cases, whose names cannot be disclosed for sensitivity and confidentiality reasons.

 

 

Civil Law

                                                                    

(Broad spectrum of practice including Lands and contract, Adverse Possession, Shareholders’ dispute and insolvency, Defamation, Probate, Intellectual property, Family and Dependants’ Maintenance, Family Trust)

 

 

Commercial and Company Law

 

• Re: Smart Yield Corp. Ltd. [HCMP 1417/2013]

• Represented a company director/shareholder in resisting an application for production of company accounts by another director/shareholder. (The Hon Harris J awarded indemnity costs against the other party)

 

• Re: New Higgs Boson [HCA 2228/2013]

• Shareholders’ dispute with enforcement of anti-competition agreement under duress of a company pioneered the real-life escape gaming business in H.K.

 

 

Insolvency

 

• Re: F.H. Ng (Debtor) [HCB 5967/2014]

• Represented a major insurance company in a petition for bankruptcy against one of its former agent.

 

• Re: W. Chong (Debtor) [HCB 485/2011]

• Represented a senior insurance agent in opposition to a petition for bankruptcy by his employer (the insurance company eventually withdrew the petition before the substantive hearing).

 

• Re: R. Wong (Debtor) & W.K. Wong [HCB 7588/2012]

• Representing the spouse of a well-known Chinese antique statute and artifacts collector in bankruptcy hearings.

 

 

Probate and Administration

 

• Re: The late L.Y. Lau [HCMP 3263/2013 & FCMP 71/2014]

• Represented the executor in a contentious probate action with a claim under the Inheritance (Provision For Family and Dependants) Ordinance. (The Caveat was subsequently withdrawn.)

 

• Re: The late Ms. Ki

• Representing a foreign executor in a contentious action with a claim under the Inheritance (Provision For Family and Dependants) Ordinance.

 

• Re: A senior member of a well-known family

• Advised on the validity and distribution of properties involving a large portfolio of assets of a well-known businessman in HK.

 

• Re: A senior family member’s testamentary arrangements

• Advising on the execution and validity of testamentary instruments of a senior member of a family famous in the gourmet industry.

 

 

Defamation

 

• Various Oriental Press Group related defamation cases (1998-2005).

 

• Advised and represented clients (public figures, celebrities and well-known organizations) in defamation matters whose identities cannot be disclosed for confidentiality reason.

 

• [HCA147/2011]

• Represented the Defendant in a high publicity defamation case involving members of the family of a well-known real estate developer in HK (Led by Mr. Jason Pow SC)

 

• [HCA 820/2013]

• Representing the Plaintiff (a reputable businessman active in charitable activities) in a defamation claim against a clan’s men association (Led by Mr. Jason Pow SC)

 

• Re: online defamatory publications

• Representing members of a well-known family in a defamation claim against a media publisher (Led by Mr. Jason Pow SC)

Commercial Crimes

General Crimes

Family Law

General Civil and Chancery Practice

Judicial Review and Public Law Matters

Personal Injuries and Employees’ Compensation

LL.B. (Hons)	The University of Hong Kong	1996
P.C.LL.	The University of Hong Kong	1998
Certificate in Rapid Mental Interventions		2012

Consultant to the Legal Advisor of the Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data	1997-98
Chairman of the Young Barristers’ Committee	2003
Member of the Bar Council	2003
Trainer to the Hong Kong Bar on Online Legal Research	2002-2005
Deputy Special Magistrate	2005
Trainer to the Judiciary on Electronic Legal Research	2006
Deputy Magistrate	2006-2010
Honorary Consultant to the Society of Rehabilitation and Crime Prevention (Mock Trial Justice Education Project)	Since 2009
Trainer to officers of the Labour Department on Law of Evidence (1-day Workshop)	2012-2014
Trainer to officers of the Labour Department on Prosecuting Labour Offences (Advanced Courses)	2013-2014
Member of the Election Committee (Legal Sub-Sector)	2016

Douglas specializes in criminal defence work. His motto is to endeavour to protect his clients from being convicted except by a competent tribunal and upon legal evidence sufficient to support a conviction for the offence with which his client is charged. Doug’s judicial experience, together with his calm character, has well equipped him to defend any difficult and technical cases.

The following areas form a large part of Doug’s practice:

Public Order and Criminal Justice Offences
Civil Liberties and Constitutional Law
Computer Crimes and Telecommunications
Explosives and Ammunition
Dangerous Goods
Perverting the course of public justice
Offences under the Prison Rules

Election Offences
Corrupt and Illegal Practices

Commercial Crimes
Money Laundering and Conspiracy to Defraud
Fraud, Credit Card Fraud and False Accounting

Technical Defence Work
Engineers Registration Board – Inquiry Committee
Medical Council – Disciplinary Inquiry
Pharmacy and Poisons Board – Disciplinary Inquiry
Police Disciplinary Hearing by the Appropriate Tribunal

General Criminal Work
Copyright Offences
Customs and Excise Offences
Immigration Offences
Triads Offences
Sexual Offences
Murder and Personal Violence
Driving Offences
Industrial Summonses
Dangerous Drugs
Preliminary Inquiries
Mental Health

Pro-bono Work
Douglas regularly undertakes pro-bono work under the Bar Free Legal Service Scheme by the Hong Kong Bar Association and the Clinical Legal Education Programme by HKU. He is most ready to offer pro-bono trial and appeal advocacy especially for the under-privileged and mental health patients.

Douglas fights every case with utmost professionalism. He defended many high profile cases involving many celebrities but Doug prefers not to label any single case as notable to avoid comparison. If you would like to observe Doug’s court advocacy, you are welcome to contact his secretary for seeing any of his open court cases.

Author in Annotated Ordinances of Hong Kong: Magistrates’ Ordinance (Chapter 227)	2008
Author in Annotated Ordinances of Hong Kong: Interception of Communication & Surveillance Ordinance (Chapter 589)	2013
Author in Butterworths Hong Kong Media & Communication Handbook	2014

His main hobbies are in the law of evidence and studying the inner game of things, for example, rapid mental interventions and neuro-linguistic programming.

Commercial Crimes

General Crimes

Judicial Review and Public Law Matters

Civil Liberties

Public Order Offences

Disciplinary Hearings

P.C.LL.	The University of Hong Kong	2001
Law Professional Course	The Institute of Professional Legal Studies of New Zealand	1999
LL.B. (Hons)	The University of Auckland, New Zealand	1999

Trainer for the officers of the Labour Department on Investigation, Prosecution, Court Procedures and on matters of Minor Employment Claims Adjudication Board	2014,2019, 2021-2023
Part-time Lecturer for “Criminal Procedure” at The University of Hong Kong for Bachelor of Laws degree	Fall 2016
Deputy Special Magistrate	2009

Amanda Li practices in criminal and civil law.

Amanda practises in all areas of criminal law, ranging from serious traffic offences to complex general crimes. She specialises in defending money laundering and complexed commercial charges. Amanda appears as a leading junior, a led junior or alone, defending high-profile individuals across all court levels including the Court of Final Appeal. Amanda is regularly instructed by the Department of Justice to prosecute select cases in the District Court. In 2009, Amanda served as a Deputy Special Magistrate.

Amanda’s expertise as a leading junior in money laundering, complex commercial crimes and general crime has been recognised by the Doyles Guide:

• “Preeminent” Junior Counsel, Doyles Guide 2025 (Leading Criminal Law Barristers – Hong Kong)
• “Recommended” Junior Counsel, Doyles Guide 2024 (Leading Criminal Law Barristers – Hong Kong)

The Doyles’ Guide highlights a list of leading Barristers practising in criminal law matters in the Hong Kong market who have been identified by the region’s Criminal Law solicitors and fellow counsel for their expertise and abilities in the area.
https://doylesguide.com/leading-criminal-law-barristers-hong-kong-2025/

In her civil commercial practice, Amanda appears in the High Court as advocate in her own right and as a led junior in cases involving fraud, shareholders and contractual disputes.

Amanda conducts cases in both Cantonese and English and speaks conversational Putonghua.

Criminal cases

1. Yan Sui Ling (嚴穗陵) v. HKSAR [2012] 15 HKCFAR 146

Chinese investor Madam Yan Sui Ling was convicted of a charge of money laundering in the District Court. Amanda, led by her Head of Chambers, Mr. Wong Man Kit S.C. conducted the appeal in the Court of Appeal against the conviction. The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal. Amanda, led by Mr. Wong S.C., further conducted the appeal in the Court of Final Appeal, and leave to appeal was granted on the limb of substantial and grave injustice. The Court of Final Appeal accepted their submissions and quashed Madam Yan’s conviction. The case involved the significant issue of the underground banking system in mainland China on money laundering offences in Hong Kong.

 

2. HKSAR v. Shum Kin Wing (沈建榮) and Another (CACC No. 437/2013; DCCC No. 175/2013)

The Defendants were charged with money laundering offences based on their five years’ bank account transactions and their tax returns. Amanda, led by Mr. Wong S.C., defended the Defendants and they were convicted of a number of charges after trial. Amanda, led by Mr. Wong S.C. conducted the appeal in the Court of Appeal and the convictions were quashed, and no retrial was ordered. The issues involved points of law arising from the Court of Final Appeal’s decision in Pang Hung Fai and whether the trial judge erred in his findings of facts and his application of the test as expounded in Pang Hung Fai.

 

3. HKSAR v. Ng Yiu Chung (吳耀宗) [2025] HKDC 223

In 2018, a school bus rolled downhill in North Point, resulting in a fatal accident that killed give people and seriously injured two others. In 2019, the Defendant was summoned for vacating his vehicle without setting the brake, to which he pleaded guilty and was fined HK$2,000. In 2023, he was re-arrested and charged with more serious offences, namely, dangerous driving causing five deaths and grievous bodily harm to two others. The matter was transferred to the District Court for trial. Amanda, representing the Defendant applied for a permanent stay of proceedings, relying on the rule against double jeopardy（「免受雙重損害」原則which extends beyond the principle of autrefois convict/ acquit（「一罪兩審」）.

Amanda successfully obtained a permanent stay of the proceedings on the grounds that the second prosecution was based on the same or substantially similar facts, with no special or exceptional circumstances to justify it. Consequently, the rule against double jeopardy was breached, constituting a violation of Article 11(6) of the Hong Kong Bill of Rights which mandates a permanent stay of proceedings in such cases. Even if Article 11(6) did not apply, the court would still have exercised its discretion to order a permanent stay under common law. Amanda also successfully applied for costs.

 

4. HKSAR v. Lee Kam Chuen (李錦泉) [2023] HKDC 1055

The Defendant, a van driver, while making a right turn at an intersection, struck an elderly person in a wheelchair crossing the road at a pedestrian crossing. The elderly person died on the way to the hospital. The Prosecution relied on expert evidence from a reconstruction to say that the Defendant could have seen the deceased more than 5 seconds before moment of impact had he paid proper attention to the traffic ahead. The Defendant was charged with dangerous driving causing death. Amanda represented him at trial in the District Court and successfully defended the Defendant against the charge of dangerous driving. Defendant was found not guilty of dangerous driving causing death.

 

5. HKSAR v. Koon Wing Yee (官永義), Sham Man Keung (沈文強) and others (HCCC No. 66/2010)

Businessman Mr. Koon Wing Yee and his co-defendants were charged with blackmailing Hui Chi Ming over a money dispute involving the shares of a locally listed company as well as possession of firearms. Amanda, led by Mr. Wong S.C., defended one of the co-defendants Mr. Sham Man Keung before a jury at the Court of First Instance. The defendants were acquitted of all charges after trial.

 

6. HKSAR v. Wong Cho-shing, Lau Cheuk-nga, Pak Wing-bun and 4 Others (CACC No.38/2017)

Amanda, led by Mr. Wong S.C., is representing Detective Sergeant Pak Wing-bun who was one of the 7 police officers convicted in the District Court for assaulting protestor Tsang Kin Chiu in the Central Occupy Movement in 2014 in an appeal against both conviction and sentence in the Court of Appeal.

 

7. HKSAR v. Yeung Ka Sing Carson (楊家誠) (CACC No. 101/2014)

Businessman and former president of English football club Birmingham City FC Mr. Carson Yeung was convicted of money laundering offences in the District Court. Amanda, led by Mr. Wong S.C. prepared the perfected grounds of appeal for Mr. Yeung in the appeal to the Court of Appeal before the release of the Court of Final Appeal’s decision in Pang Hung Fai and conducted the first bail pending appeal application for Mr. Yeung.

 

8. HKSAR v. Wong Kwan (黃坤), Lew Mun-hung (劉夢熊), Yik Siu Hung (翼小紅) and Another (HCCC No. 561/2013)

Amanda, led by Mr. Wong S.C., defended businesswoman Madam Yik Siu Hung in the complicated and lengthy jury trial at the Court of First Instance who was charged with conspiracy to defraud and money laundering, arising from the purchase of an overseas oilfield by a locally listed company Pearl Oriental Oil Limited. Madam Yik was convicted after trial

 

9. HKSAR v Wong Chun Yin (CACC 50/2018)

The Appellant was convicted of trafficking in 18.45kg of ketamine after trial and was sentenced to 22 years of imprisonment. Amanda conducted the appeal and was granted leave on two grounds. The Court of Appeal accepted her submissions and quashed Mr. Wong’s conviction.

 

10. HKSAR v Shek Hiu Fung & 2 Others (DCCC892/2019; CACC281/2021)

Amanda successfully defended Madam Shek who was charged with conspiracy to defraud the Chinese University and was acquitted after trial with costs. The DOJ case stated the case to the Court of Appeal and appeal against the costs order and Amanda will be having conduct of the matter at the Court of Appeal level.

 

11. HKSAR v. Wong Ying Ho Kennedy (黃英豪), Chui Chuen Shun (徐傳順) and another (HCCC No. 409/2015)

Amanda, led by Mr. Wong S.C., acted for Dr. Kennedy Wong Ying Ho (former chairman of a listed company and member of the Political Consultative Conference of the PRC) who is charged with bribery offences. The jury trial at the Court of First Instance originally scheduled to commence in February 2017, but upon the application by the Department of Justice, the Court ordered that the matter be transferred to the District Court for trial. Amanda is not involved in the District Court trial.

 

12. Application for a summons of private prosecution against Madam Chan Sock Fun (陳淑芬) (ESMP 9236/2016)

Amanda, led by Mr. Wong S.C., represented Madam Chan Sock Fun, former organizer of Jacky Cheung’s concerts, in resisting an application for a summons of private prosecution against her for conspiracy to defraud in respect of the matters arising out of Jacky Cheung’s ½ century world tour concerts. The application was dismissed by the Magistrate for lack of merits.

 

13. HKSAR v. Ip Man Man (葉民文) (DCCC No.801/2002)

Amanda, led by Mr. Wong S.C., defended Mr. Ip Man Man, former chairman of a locally listed company in a District Court trial, who was charged with embezzlement of funds belonging to the listed company of which he was the chairman and the majority shareholder. The Defendant was acquitted after trial.

 

14. Secretary for Justice v. Cheung Chung Chit (CACV No.206/2003 on appeal from HCAL No. 172/2002; [2003] 3 HKLRD 447); HKSAR v. Cheung Chung Chit (DCCC No.521/2002)

Amanda, led by a Senior Counsel, successfully applied for a permanent stay of criminal proceedings for businessman Mr. Cheung Chung Chit in a District Court trial who was charged with having in possession of counterfeit banknotes. Amanda, led by two Senior Counsel, also appeared in the High Court in an application for judicial review made by the Secretary for Justice against the decision of the trial judge in granting a permanent stay and also in an appeal against the High Court decision. The Court of Appeal reaffirmed the High Court decision in, inter alia, quashing the decision granting a permanent stay on grounds that the application was made on a premature basis.

 

Civil cases:

Xu Shengheng and Ever Sincere Investment Ltd v. Cheung Kwan and Cheung Kwan and Financial International Holdings Ltd v. Xu Shengheng & Others (HCA No. 291 of 2009; CACV No. 133 of 2012)

 

New World Development Co Ltd v. Sun Hung Kai Securities Ltd (2006) 9 HKCFAR 403

 

The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Ltd v. New World Development Co. Ltd & Others (2006) 9 HKCFAR 234

 

Modern Office Technology Limited v. New World TMT Limited (CACV No. 292 & 293/2006

Commercial Crimes

General Crimes

General Civil and Chancery Practice

Jon obtained his first degree in Business Administration in the United States and his second degree in Law in Hong Kong. He commenced full practice in 2002.

Jon sat as deputy magistrate in the law courts of Hong Kong from 2012 to 2013. He is also a contributing editor of Archbold Hong Kong since 2010. He is an independent non-executive director of two listed companies in Hong Kong and also serves as legal advisor to the Hong Kong Police Disciplinary Board.

Jon enjoys both civil and criminal matters with a predominant interest in the latter. He has extensive experience in handling complex commercial cases on fraud, corruption, money laundering as well as offences and regulations concerning the Securities and Futures Commission. Has has also defended numerous high profile cases, some of which lasted for over 100 days in court.

In recent years, Jon has advised on numerous corporate compliance issues to over 40 corporations that were successfully listed in the Hong Kong Stock Exchange.

Commercial Crimes

General Crimes

General Civil and Chancery Practice

Civil Liberties

Public Order Offences

P.C.LL.	The University of Hong Kong
Bachelor of Business Administration (Finance & Marketing)	Wilfrid Laurier University
Executive Course in Corporate and Finance Law (Competition, Mergers & Acquisitions)	The University of Hong Kong
Senior Management Course for Business & Finance Executives	Tsinghua University, Beijing

Sylvia regularly appears in the Magistracies, the District Court, the Court of First Instance, and the Court of Appeal as defence counsel in trials and appeals. She also appears in investigations and hearings of Securities and Futures Commission, Hong Kong Monetary Authority, Hong Kong Federation of Insurers and Liquor Licensing Board.

The nature of her cases includes: Commercial Fraud cases, Money Laundering cases, SFC investigations, ICAC Cases, Customs & Excise and Immigration cases, Drug offences, Theft offences, Assault and Wounding offences, and Sexual offences, etc.

Commercial Crimes

General Crimes

Family Law

General Civil and Chancery

Judicial Review and Public Law Matters

Accredited Mediator (General)	Hong Kong International Arbitration Center	2011
BVC	College of Law, London	2004
LL.B. (Hons)	University of East Anglia, UK	2002

Local bilingual practitioner

Appearing as advocate in all levels of Court in Hong Kong for both civil and criminal matters. At the same time engaged in advisory and drafting works regularly

Deputy Magistrate	2016

Experience in Criminal Cases

Extensive experience in white collar crimes: ICAC and CCB investigated crimes, corruption, LC fraud, conspiracy to defraud, money laundering, false accounting, using false instruments; other criminal cases including trafficking in dangerous drugs, sexual, industrial summons, immigration, trademarks and C & E cases.

HIGH COURT CRIMINAL PRACTICE (JURY TRIAL)

 

1. HKSAR v Hung Ching Pui, HCCC 113/2012

Defended a complicated commercial fraud case in a High Court jury trial. All the charges laid against the D8 were acquitted on a unanimous verdict. This case involved complicated experts’ evidence on money flow and false transactions. The trial lasted for over 60 days.

 

2. HKSAR v Tsang Tsz Kin, HCCC 64/2015

Defended a trafficking in dangerous drugs case in a High Court jury trial. D was acquitted on an unanimous verdict. This case involved complicated legal issue on disclosure of acquittal of defence witness. The trial lasted for 13 days.

 

3. HKSAR v. Tsang Chung Man, HCCC 361/2015

Defended a trafficking in dangerous drugs case in a High Court jury trial. D was acquitted on an unanimous verdict. The trial lasted for 7 days.

 

4. HKSAR v Wong Chi Hung, HCCC 478/2016

Defended a trafficking in dangerous drugs case in a High Court jury trial. D was acquitted on an unanimous verdict. This is a retrial case which lasted for 11 days.

 

5. HKSAR v Cheung Chi Wong, HCCC 137/2014

Defended a conspiracy in trafficking case and conducted a voir dire lasted for 10 days in High Court.

 

 

DISTRICT COURT CRIMINAL PRACTICE

 

6. HKSAR v Lau Wah DCCC 46/2014

Defended a fraud case in the District Court. The trial lasted for over 10 days.

 

7. HKSAR v Liu Shaohui DCCC 852/2013

Defended a money laundering case in the District Court. The trial lasted for over 10 days.

 

8. HKSAR v Chan Yun Sum DCCC 596/2015

Defended one of the Defendants in the District Court case which was investigated by ICAC against an insurance agent and another defrauding insurance company.

 

9. Prosecuted and defended various criminal cases in Magistrates’ Courts.

 

 

Selected criminal cases working with leading Senior Counsel\

 

10. HKSAR v Lu Da Yong and others DCCC 127/2005 (2005-2008)

Defended in a corruption and conspiracy to defraud case led by Mr Wong Man Kit SC. It involved a stay application based on infringement of professional legal privilege.

 

11. Re Lu Dayong CACV 139/2008 HCAL 45/2008

Made application for matters in relation to Article 35 of the Basic Law of HKSAR and Article 14 of the Hong Kong Bill of Rights Ordinance Cap.383 led by Mr Denis Chang SC.

 

12. HKSAR v Agnes Wong Kin Yee (2008)

Defended a case of false accounting investigated by the ICAC in the District Court led by Counsel Mr Wong Man Kit SC.

 

13. HKSAR v Chan Siu & Others (2007)

Defended a case of copyright offence and money laundering in the District Court led by Mr Wong Man Kit SC. All charges were cleared.

 

14. HKSAR v Kwok Shun On CACC 369/2005

Led by Mr Wong Man Kit SC in the aforesaid criminal appeal in the Court of Appeal.

 

15. HKSAR v Lau Chun Kit HCMA 34/2012

Led by Mr Wong Man Kit SC in the aforesaid criminal appeal on an appeal of indecent assaults charges.

 

16. HKSAR v Cheung Man Lai HCMA 338/2016

Jointly represented the Applicant with another Counsel on an appeal of an indecent assault charge.

 

 

Experience in civil cases

Appearance for the Defence and the Plaintiff for hearings of common law claims, personal injuries, employees’ compensations, lands disputes, matrimonial, contract claims, IP, company winding up and capital reduction for a listed company, Mental Health Ordinance Part IV applications.

 

 

Selected civil cases

 

COMMON LAW CLAIMS

 

17. Tong Siu Wai v Poon Wing Fu [2012] 5 HKLRD 407, HCPI 44/2009

Appeared for trial proceedings and resisting an appeal.

 

18. Chan To Ning v Tsui Yu Ming, HCPI 849/2009 & CACV 262/2013

Appeared for trial and resisting a leave for appeal and applying for security for costs for appeal.

 

13. Advisory works and drafting works on Personal Injuries for over 100 cases.

 

ADMIRALTY

19. Forsa Multimedia v C&C Logistics (HK) Ltd, DCCJ 3467/2009,

HCMP 683/2011

Appeared for leave for appeal in a shipping matter.

 

COMMERCIAL AND COMPANY LAW

20. Appeared for a Petition of Capital reduction of a listed company in High Court.

 

21. Advisory works regarding legal issues of an IPO; Money Lenders Ordinance Cap 136; commercial contracts and agreements for listed companies.

 

22. Appeared for a listed company for an urgent Injunctive Action with leading Counsel Mr Clive Grossman.

 

 

LAND

23. Appeared for various interlocutory injunctive matters in relation to land and property disputes in High Court involving severance and Partition Ordinance.

 

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTIES

 

24. Represent a famous martial art master in a trademark dispute case.

 

 

Experience in mediation

Conducted various mediations as a mediator for commercial, property and land related disputes.

 

 

Other related experience

Represented Claimants in CAT cases.

Commercial Crimes

General Crimes

Family Law

General Civil and Chancery Practice

Judicial Review and Public Law

Personal Injuries and Employees’ Compensation

Mediation and ADR

LL.M. (IT & IPL)	The University of Hong Kong	2009
P.C.LL.	City University of Hong Kong	2005
LL.B. (Hons)	City University of Hong Kong	2004

Judicial Appointment

Deputy Magistrate (Kowloon City Magistrates’ Courts)	2015 & 2024
Deputy Magistrate (West Kowloon Magistrates’ Courts)	2017, 2018 & 2019
Deputy Magistrate (Eastern Magistrates’ Courts)	2020

Prosecution (Counsel on fiat)

District Court	2020-present
Listed in the Magistrates’ Courts “A” List (Special Fiat)	2010-present
Listed in the Magistrates’ Courts “B” List (General Fiat)	2006-2010

Publications

Safety and Construction, Archbold Hong Kong (2024) Chapter 44	Contributing Editor
“Rethinking the Fairness of Additional Penalty in Fixed Penalty Offences”, Hong Kong Lawyer (Thomson Reuters, February 2023) , pp 46-50.	Co-author

Dick was called to the Hong Kong Bar in 2006. He has been admitted to the degree of Master of Laws in Information Technology and Intellectual Property Law in 2009.

Dick is a bilingual counsel and practice in both criminal and civil law in all level of courts.

In respect of his criminal practice, Dick specializes in both trials and appeals with extensive experience in defending industrial summonses, all others departmental summons, serious and complex white-collar crime, such as money laundering, ICAC, CCB and SFC investigated crimes, corruptions, complex commercial frauds, conspiracy offences, sexual offences, trafficking in dangerous drugs, immigration cases, customs and excise cases, forfeiture proceedings, road traffic matters and many others.

Dick has also prosecuted cases for the HKSAR since 2006.

Dick sat as a Deputy Magistrate in 2015, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020 and 2024.

In respect of his civil practice, Dick’s experience covers commercial disputes, land disputes, personal injuries, town planning board appeal, judicial review, copyright and trademark disputes, company shareholders’ disputes, matrimonial proceedings and many others.

Fluent in Cantonese and English.

Shortlist

Court of Final Appeal

HKSAR v. CHAN MAN TAT (陳敏達), unreported, FAMC 43/2020; [2021] HKCFA 8

HKSAR v. Kan, Brian Ping Chee, unreported, FAMC 64/2012 (Led by MK Wong SC);

Chan Wing Yiu v. HKSAR, unreported, FAMC60/2008 (Led by MK Wong SC).

Court of Appeal

律政司司長 對 李汶錡, unreported, CAAR 17/2021; [2022] HKCA 719

律政司司長 訴 SWS [2021] 1 HKLRD 1117; CAAR 1/2020; [2020] HKCA 788

HKSAR v. Cheng Pak Kit, unreported, CACC 232/2019; [2020] HKCA 555

香港特別行政區 訴 呂浚森及另二人 [2021] 4 HKLRD 148; CACC 331/2018; [2020] HKCA 516

HKSAR v. Kiu Mei Ling and others, unreported, CACC 110/2019; [2021] HKCA 78
香港特別行政區 訴 游祖怡, unreported, CACC 236/2018; [2020] HKCA 764

香港特別行政區 訴 陳敏達, unreported, CACC 344/2018; [2020] HKCA 305

香港特別行政區 訴 甘偉興, unreported, CACC 178/2018; [2020] HKCA 301

HKSAR v. Lau Man Chi, unreported, CACC 326/2018; [2019] HKCA 139

香港特別行政區 訴 韋道領, unreported, CACC 188/2017; [2018] HKCA 511

香港特別行政區 訴 陳文耀, unreported, CACC 177/2017; [2018] HKCA 804

HKSAR v. Siu Kwok Chun [2017] 4 HKLRD 102

HKSAR v. Cheung Ka Yan, unreported, CACC 406/2014

香港特別行政區 訴 馬迪倫 [2015] 1 HKLRD 374

HKSAR v. Ma Tik Lun Dicky [2015] 1 HKLRD 380

HKSAR v. Chui Yuet Kwan Ady, unreported, CACC 404/2014

HKSAR v. Chan Pun Chung and Tang Yan Leung, unreported, CACC 229/2014 (Led by MK Wong, SC)

香港特別行政區 訴 黃泓偉又名黃偉雄, unreported, CACC 104/2013

HKSAR v. Kan, Brian Ping Chee, unreported, CACC 174/2011 (Led by MK Wong SC);

HKSAR v. Yiu Chan Hung, unreported, CACC 462/2009;

HKSAR v. Cheng Lung Cheong Brian, unreported, CACC 174/2011 (Led by MK Wong, SC)

香港特別行政區 訴 譚悅華, unreported, CACC 473/2010 (Led by MK Wong, SC)

HKSAR v. Chiu Kit and Another, unreported, CACC 210/2009

Magistracy Appeal

香港特別行政區 訴 林曉樺, unreported, HCMA 32/2022; [2022] HKCFI 2567

香港特別行政區 訴 陳柏傑, unreported, HCMA 50/2021; [2022] HKCFI 1262

香港特別行政區 訴 何梓洋, unreported, HCMA 222/2021; [2022] HKCFI 1546

香港特別行政區 訴 LHY, unreported, HCMA 126/2019; [2021] HKCFI 244

香港特別行政區 訴 區煒冲, unreported, HCMA 241/2019; [2020] HKCFI 351

香港特別行政區 訴 柳志華, unreported, HCMA 12/2019; [2019] HKCFI 1851

香港特別行政區 訴 林韋彤, unreported, HCMA 68/2017; [2018] HKCFI 69

HKSAR v. Kwan On Construction Co. Ltd., unreported, HCMA 11/2017; [2018] HKCFI 1640 (Led by Mr. Andrew Bruce, SC)

香港特別行政區 訴 梁均棟, unreported, HCMA 388/2016

香港特別行政區 訴 魏俊傑, unreported, HCMA 450/2016

香港特別行政區 訴 永明建築有限公司, unreported, HCMA 647/2015

香港特別行政區 訴 黃鴻泳, unreported, HCMA 321/2014

香港特別行政區 訴 盧炳輝, unreported, HCMA 302/2014

香港特別行政區 訴 港澳(亞洲)工程有限公司, unreported, HCMA 84/2014

香港特別行政區 訴 趙志導, unreported, HCMA 52/2013

香港特別行政區 訴 羅華保, unreported, HCMA 501/2013 (Led by Selwyn Yu, SC)

香港特別行政區 訴 陳德培, unreported, HCMA 377/2013

香港特別行政區 訴 周麗珍, unreported, HCMA 751/2012

香港特別行政區 訴 余俊然, unreported, HCMA 766/2012

香港特別行政區 訴 簡炳墀, unreported, HCMA 48/2012

香港特別行政區 訴 岑仲樑, unreported, HCMA 8/2012 (Led by MK Wong, SC)

香港特別行政區 訴 聯力建築有限公司, unreported, HCMA 820/2011

香港特別行政區 訴 何志輝 [2010] 4 HKLRD 147

HKSAR v. Ho Chi Fai [2010] 4 HKLRD 151

香港特別行政區 訴 毛偉鴻, unreported, HCMA 43/2010

香港特別行政區 訴 林嘉榮, unreported, HCMA 107/2009

香港特別行政區 訴 吳壽强, unreported, HCMA 292/2009

香港特別行政區 訴 李文飛, unreported, HCMA 730/2009

香港特別行政區 訴 吳克江, unreported, HCMA 1037/2008

香港特別行政區 訴 陳榮耀, unreported, HCMA 205/2008

香港特別行政區 訴 黎正匡, unreported, HCMA 1037/2008

香港特別行政區 訴 蔡崎, unreported, HCMA 621/2008

Notable Civil Cases

Stephane Wong v. Town Planning Board, Town Planning Appeal Case No. 5 of 2014

J.T. Ltd v. Kung Tat Chow [2014] 5 HKLRD 180 (HCMP 435/2013)

Great Crown International Ltd v. Ample Sino Holdings Ltd, unreported, DCCJ 845/2012;

Sun Hing Hong Travel Agency Co Ltd v. Westminster Travel Ltd, unreported, HCA 662/2010 & HCA 680/2010 (Led by Walker Sham, Esq);
Fuk Fai Decoration Ltd v. Leung Shuk Ching, unreported, DCCJ 4881/2008;

Chan Hoi Fai Raymond v. Chan Kwai Keung [2007] 5 HKC 473 (HCMP 1517/2007)

Commercial Crimes

General Crimes

Family Law

General Civil and Chancery Practice

Judicial Review and Public Law Matters

Personal Injuries and Employees’ Compensation

2008	LLB (Hons) University of Bristol, UK (first class of honour in Intellectual Property)
2009	PCLL, University of Hong Kong
2010	Middle Temple Advocacy Training Scholarship

2018	Deputy Magistrate (Kowloon City Magistrates’ Courts) Deputy Magistrate – Eastern Magistrates’ Courts
2019	Deputy Magistrate (Eastern Magistrates’ Courts) Deputy Adjudicator – Small Claims Tribunal
2020	Deputy Magistrate – West Kowloon Magistrates’ Courts
2023	Deputy Magistrate – Eastern Magistrates’ Courts
2024	Deputy Magistrate – Eastern Magistrates’ Courts

Leona is called to the Hong Kong Bar in 2010 and has since been developing a broad spectrum of practice in criminal and civil matters, with focus on the former.

Having extensive experience in handling all areas of criminal cases both at trial and appellate levels, Leona is frequently briefed for cases of sexual offences, ICAC and CCB investigated crimes, money laundering, fraud and forgery. She also represents clients in disciplinary hearings by medical council and other regulatory tribunals.

Leona is regularly instructed by Department of Justice to prosecute in District Courts and selected cases in Magistrates’ courts as special fiat.

Since 2018, Leona has been appointed as deputy magistrate on a number of occasions.

Leona accepts instructions to represent clients under SFC investigation to answer written enquiries and attend investigation interview. She has been appointed as independent investigation committee in appraising possible misconduct and providing advice for companies pending to be listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange.

In recent years, Leona handles civil cases involving complex factual matrix and criminal elements whereas her emphasis on analysing evidence and cross examination of witnesses is highly appreciated by the clients.

Commercial Crimes

Death Inquests

Disciplinary Hearings

Family Law

General Civil and Chancery Practice

General Crimes

Mediation and ADR

Personal Injuries and Employees’ Compensation

Public Order Offences

Highlights of Recent Cases

Chen Simon Guomin v Chan Choi Har Ivy and ors [2023] HKCFI 3135

Acted for the Plaintiff in a claim arising from outstanding loans and interest totalling over HK$52 million. The Court ruled in favour of the Plaintiff after trial (led by Mr. Lawrence Ng).

EW v HC [2023] HKCFI 2619; [2023] HKCFI 3157

Acted for the Claimant in an Arbitration in which the Tribunal allowed the Claimant’s claim for the sum of over US$6.4 million. The Respondent’s application to set aside the Award was dismissed by the Court. The Respondent’s application for leave to appeal against the Court’s decision was also dismissed.

Alpha & Leader Associates Limited v Victory Mega Trading Limited [2023] HKCFI 2322; [2024] HKCFI 788; [2024] HKCA 709

Acted for the Plaintiff and obtained a Mareva injunction against the Defendant up to the amount of approximately RMB 320 million. The Defendant’s application to discharge the injunction was dismissed and the Defendant’s applications for leave to appeal were also dismissed by the Court of First Instance and the Court of Appeal (led my Mr. Lawrence Ng).

Warren Gary Lichtenstein v Annabelle Sarah Bond and anor. [2023] HKCFI 1511

Acted for the Plaintiff in an application involving issues regarding (1) conspiracy to injure; (2) breach of Quistclose trust; and (3) Henderson v Henderson abuse (led by Mr. Ambrose Ho SC).

Ng Hing Yau and anor. v Kong Art Limited [2023] HKCA 212

Acted for the Plaintiffs and resisted the Third Party’s application for extension of time to appeal against the First Instance Judgment, in which the Third Party was ordered to personally bear the Plaintiffs’ costs of the action. The Court of Appeal affirmed the principle that bad faith or impropriety is not required to support a non-party costs order if it can be shown that the third party would stand to personally benefit from the litigation.

The Incorporated Owners of Sun Hing Building v Join Profit (Hong Kong) Limited and anor. [2022] HKLdT 56

Acted for the Applicant in its claim for a demolition order and injunctive relief regarding the respondents’ occupation of a common corridor. The Court ruled in favour of the Applicant after trial (led by Mr. Lawrence Ng).

Ng Hing Yau and anor. v Kong Art Limited [2022] 2 HKLRD 1153; [2022] HKCFI 1381

Acted for the Plaintiffs and obtained a personal costs order against the director of the Defendant pursuant to s.52A(1) of the High Court Ordinance

Yoe Han Yauw v Yoe Han Hian and ors [2022] HKCA 498

Acted for the Applicant in an appeal against an adverse costs order resulting from an Originating Summons seeking inspection of documents pursuant to section 740 of the Companies Ordinance (Cap. 622). The appeal was allowed and the costs order was set aside and replaced with a costs order in favour of the Applicant.

Cai Hong Ping v Securities and Futures Commission (SFAT 3/2019)

Acted for the Applicant in his review against the SFC’s decision to prohibit him from conducting various regulated activities for 5 years under s.196 of the SFO. The case involved an assessment of whether the Applicant should be held liable as the purported sponsor principal in relation to an IPO. The review was allowed and the sanctions imposed on the Applicant by the SFC were set aside.

Yi Shun Da Capital Limited v Securities and Futures Commission (SFAT 4/2020)

Acted for the Applicant in its review against the SFC’s decision to fine and discipline the company in respect of its conduct as sole sponsor of a listing application. Upon review, the SFC’s decision was upheld but the sanctions imposed were reduced (led by Mr. Jonathan Chang SC).

The Yin Nin Savings Mortgage Loan & Land Investment Company Limited and another v Siu Sing Chau [2022] HKCA 613

Acted for the 8^th Defendant in an appeal involving issues regarding (1) separate legal representation by co-plaintiffs; and (2) the application of the slip rule.

Ng Yuk Pui Kelly v Ng Lai Ling Winnie and ors (2021) 24 HKCFAR 401; [2021] HKCFA 40

Acted for the 1st and 2nd Defendants in an application for leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal involving issues regarding (1) the scope of application of contractual estoppel and (2) the application of the test of unequivocal recoverability under the doctrine of part performance (led by Mr. Lawrence Ng).

Ng Yuk Pui Kelly v Ng Lai Ling Winnie and ors [2021] 5 HKC 1

Acted for the 1st and 2nd Defendants in an appeal involving issues regarding (1) the scope of application of contractual estoppel and (2) the application of the test of unequivocal recoverability under the doctrine of part performance (led by Mr. Paul Lam SC).

Ng Yeuk Chu Winnie v Ng Sung Kui and anor. [2021] HKCFI 2116; [2020] HKCFI 2524

Acted for the 1^st Defendant in a dispute over the appointment of the administrator of an estate. The Court ruled in favour of the 1^st Defendant, appointed the 1^st Defendant as the sole administrator of the Estate, and dismissed the Plaintiff’s application. The Plaintiff’s subsequent application to vary the costs order nisi was also dismissed.

Ng Yuk Pui Kelly v Estate of Dung Wai Man (deceased) [2021] 1 HKLRD 1037

Acted for the 2^nd Defendant in applications for stay pending appeal and amending the notice of appeal. The Court of Appeal set out the relevant legal principles regarding stay pending appeal and granting leave to amend a notice of appeal.

Lee Kam Tai v Chan Kam Wah [2021] HKCFI 3496

Acted for the Plaintiff in committal proceedings against the Defendant. The Court granted an order for committal and imposed a suspended custodial sentence on the Defendant (led by Mr. Lawrence Ng).

 

Other Selected Cases

 

Criminal Litigation

HKSAR v Zheng Zhi Long [2020] HKCA 105

Acting for the Appellant in an appeal against a conviction of money laundering involving US$5million (led by Ms. Maggie Wong SC)

HKSAR v Lau (KCCC 1238/2022)

Acted for the Defendant against a charge of indecent assault. The Defendant was acquitted of the charge (led by Mr. Wong Man Kit SC).

HKSAR v Tomoaki (ESCC 2590/2018)

Acted for the Defendant against a charge of money laundering arising from an alleged online romance scam. The Defendant was acquitted of the charge.

HKSAR v Chan, AGL (STCC 3575/2018; STS 4969/2018)

Acted for the Defendants in a case involving charge of being an employer of a person who is not lawfully employable. The Defendants were acquitted of the charge.

HKSAR v Choi (ESCC 3164/2018)

Acted for the Defendant in a case involving charges of indecent assault and common assault. The Defendant was acquitted of the charges.

HKSAR v Kim and others (ESCC 654/2017)

Acted for the 2^nd and 3^rd Defendants in a case involving charges of breach of condition of stay and practicing medicine without a licence. Upon written representations made by Counsel, the Department of Justice offered no evidence against the 2nd and 3rd Defendants upon an application made by the 2nd and 3rd Defendants.

HKSAR v Lew (STS 772/2016)

Acted for the Defendant against a charge of unlawful occupation of unleased land. The Defendant was acquitted of the charge.

 

Commercial Litigation

Fuji Xerox (Hong Kong) Limited v Modern Education Group Limited (HCA 1459/2019)

Acted for the Plaintiff in a claim for outstanding service payments of HK$2.8M and obtained summary judgment against the Defendant

Li Yong Hong, Huang Qingbo v Best Fame International Capital Limited (HCA 273/2019)

Acted for the Defendants in a claim for the sum of HK$35.5M and resisted an application for summary judgment

VIP Watch Jewellery Company Limited v Zhang Yan [2019] HKDC 404

Acted for the Defendant in a claim based on conversion of a luxury watch. The Court ruled in favour of the Defendant and dismissed the Plaintiff’s claim after trial.

AALL & Zyleman Company Ltd v Emirate Distributors Ltd [2020] HKCFI 851

Acted for the Defendants against a claim for negligence in the sum of US$1.89M (led by Mr. Lawrence Ng)

Reinhold Thurner v Excellent Century Holdings Limited [2020] HKCFI 2550

Acted for the Defendant in claim regarding alleged fraudulent scheme.

FCL China Development Pte Ltd and anor. v Lai Yuen Ling and others (FAMV 40/2015)

Acted for the Defendants in leave application to the Court of Final Appeal in dispute regarding settlement deeds in the sums of US$5.7M and RMB 0.79M (led by Mr. John Scott SC)

Beijing Corporation Investment Limited (in Liquidation) v Sui Ka Man (HCA 2551/2014)

Acted for the Defendant against claims in the sum of HK$5M based on unjust enrichment (led by Mr. Anson Wong SC)

Kinetics Medical and Health Group Limited and ors. v Dr. Tse Ivan Cheong Yau (HCA 1115/2010)

Acted for the Defendant against a claim by a medical corporation regarding the outstanding purchase price of a medical clinic (led by Mr. Lawrence Ng).

China Wah Yan Healthcare Limited and ors v Dr. Chan Leung Kwok, Clement [2019] HKCFI 2047

Acted for the Plaintiffs in claim for breach of fiduciary duties and breach of a service contract. Obtained injunctive relief against the Defendant (led by Mr. Lawrence Ng).

Chan Yuen Tung v Ko Kin Hang (HCA 1864/2013)

Acted for the Defendant in dispute regarding subscription agreement for shares in a listed company

Re Ocean Ever Company Limited (HCA 1821/2014)

Acted for the Defendant in case involving money had and received/unjust enrichment.

Re Oceanwin Global Limited (HCA 1886/2014)

Acted for the Defendant in case involving alleged shareholder’s loan to company. Obtained an order for security for costs against the Plaintiff. The Plaintiff ultimately withdrew the claim against the Defendant.

Re Jiang Hong Yan and another (HCA 2673/2017)

Acted for the Plaintiffs in an action for specific performance of a contract and application for interim injunctive relief

Re Ip Ming Hon Vincent (HCA 773/2019)

Acted for the Plaintiff in claim regarding operation of competing business and breach of fiduciary duties (led by Mr. Lawrence Ng)

Re Lu Young De (HCA 1501/2017)

Obtained injunctive relief for the plaintiff in a trust property dispute (led by Mr. Lawrence Ng)

Re American Lighting Inc (HCA 1352/2016)

Obtained injunctive relief for a USA company in an email fraud case.

Re IBoss Business Consultation Limited (DCCJ 4623/2014)

Acting for the Defendant in dispute arising from sale of business

Re Rise Honest International Limited (HCA 2018/2014)

Acting for the Plaintiff in setting aside application

Re Ego Finance Limited (DCCJ 5142/2015)

Acting for the Plaintiff in setting aside application

Re Ego Finance Limited (DCCJ 2810/2012)

Acted for the Plaintiff in setting aside application

Re World International Development (BVI) Limited (HCA 1482/2010)

Advised the liquidators in shares dispute

 

Companies Litigation

Re Plentiful Mark Limited [2020] HKCFI 1315

Acted for the Plaintiff in an application to dispute the validity of winding-up proceedings commenced under s.228A of the CWUMPO and obtained the relief sought.

Re Plentiful Mark Limited (HCMP 2288/2019)

Acted for the Defendant in action regarding claims of unfair preferences pursuant to s.266 of the CWUMPO. The Plaintiff’s claim was withdrawn upon the Defendant’s application to the Court to stay the action.

Re Peking Fur Factory (Hong Kong) Limited [2019] HKCFI 2141

Acted for the Plaintiffs in action regarding the validity of the purported creditor’s voluntary winding-up of the company and obtained relief sought (led by Mr. Clifford Smith SC)

Re Hua Han Health Industry Holdings Limited [2019] HKCFI 2032

Acted for the Opposing Contributories regarding an application for a regulating order.

Re Happily Limited (HCA 776/2018)

Acting for the 1^st Defendant in a claim of alleged breach of director’s fiduciary duties

Re DBI Innovations Limited (HCCW 204/2015)

Acted for the Petitioner in Winding Up Petition.

Re Tes Asia Pacific Limited (HCCW 202/2014)

Acted for the Respondents in Winding Up Petition/application for injunction

Re Pasco (Hong Kong) Limited (HCA 2795/2016)

Acting for the 2^nd and 3^rd Defendants in a derivative action

Re KMK (HCMP 2812/2016)

Acted for the Plaintiff in application under s.631 of the Companies Ordinance

Re Umicore AG (HK) Limited

Acted for the Respondent in application under s.108(1)(a) of the Companies Ordinance

Re Winland Finance Limited

Acting for the Applicant in application under s.757 of the Companies Ordinance

 

Construction Litigation

Re Chubb Hong Kong Limited [2018] HKDC 717

Acted for the Defendant in contractual dispute over fire system installation project. The Court ruled in favour of the Defendant and dismissed the Plaintiff’s claim (whilst allowing the Defendant’s counterclaim) after trial.

Re Yutron Tech (Hong Kong) Limited (DCCJ 5735/2016)

Acting for the Plaintiff in contractual dispute over renovation project

Re Vicki Engineering Company Limited (DCCJ 991/2016)

Acting for the Plaintiff in contractual dispute over renovation project

Re Jingo Interior Design (Hong Kong) Limited (DCCJ 5576/2015)

Acting for the Plaintiff in contractual dispute over interior fitting out project

Re APS Construction Systems (International) Limited (DCCJ 1381/2015)

Acting for the Defendant in contractual dispute over construction project

 

Costs/ Taxation

Big Island Construction (HK) Limited v Wu Yi Development Company Limited and others [2018] 2 HKLRD 1145; [2018] HKCFI 899

Acted for the defendants and obtained a personal costs order against the director of the plaintiff pursuant to s.52A(1) of the High Court Ordinance (led by Mr. Lawrence Ng)

Dung Wai Man and others v Ng Yuk Pui Kelly [2019] HKCFI 1157

Acted for the 4^th to 6^th Defendants and resisted an application for a personal costs order being made against them pursuant to s.52A(1) of the High Court Ordinance

Re Withers (a firm) [2018] HKCFI 509; [2019] HKCFI 325

Acted for the firm in taxation proceedings against a former client. Resisted taxation of four bills and resisted the former client’s argument that the Court had a common law jurisdiction to tax the bills out of time.

Re KC Ho & Fong (a firm) (HCMP 61/2014, HCA 2365/2013)

Acted for the Plaintiff in taxation proceedings against former solicitors arising from earlier matrimonial appeal proceedings. Obtained order for taxation of bills pursuant to s.67(2) of the Legal Practitioners Ordinance (Cap. 159).

Re LCC (a firm)

Acted for the firm in a claim for legal costs against a former client, and obtained summary judgment for the outstanding legal costs

Re HWY (a firm)  

Acted for the former clients in taxation proceedings against the firm. Obtained order for taxation of bills pursuant to s.67(2) of the Legal Practitioners Ordinance (Cap. 159).

Re DPW (a firm)

Acted for the Plaintiff in taxation proceedings against the firm. Obtained order for taxation of bills pursuant to s.67(2) of the Legal Practitioners Ordinance (Cap. 159)

Re WS (a firm)

Acted for the Plaintiff in taxation proceedings against the firm. Obtained order for taxation of bills pursuant to s.67(2) of the Legal Practitioners Ordinance (Cap. 159) and obtained order for partial return of interim payment.

Re ATT (a firm)

Acting for the firm in taxation proceedings against a former client.

Re PCW (a firm)

Acting for the firm in taxation proceedings against a former client.

Re SS (a firm)  

Acting for a former client in defending a claim for outstanding legal costs.

Re EAC (a firm)
Acted for the firm in taxation proceedings against a former client.

Re CLC (a firm)
Acted for the firm in taxation proceedings against a former client.

Re HFW (a firm)

Acted for a former client in taxation proceedings against the firm

Re DSC (a firm)  

Acted for a former client in taxation proceedings against the firm

Re YA (a firm)

Acted for the firm in a claim for legal costs against a former client.

Re WS (a firm)

Acted for the firm in a claim for legal costs against a former client.

Re ECC (a firm)

Acted for the Plaintiff in taxation proceedings against the firm.

Re RBJL (a firm)

Acted for the Plaintiff in taxation proceedings against the firm.

Re CLCMC (a firm)
Acted for the former client in taxation proceedings against the firm.

Re OLN (a firm)

Acted for the former client in a summary judgment application involving costs disputes against the firm.

Re LL (a firm)  

Acted for the former client in taxation proceedings against the firm.

Re HI (a firm)  

Acted for the former client in taxation proceedings against the firm.

Re JLA (a firm)

Acted for an interested party seeking to set aside a Writ of Subpoena Duces Tecum in a costs dispute.

Re EEL  

Acted for the shareholder of the company in costs disputes against directors appointed pursuant to a Reconstitution Order

Re JEK

Acted for the paying party in taxation proceedings. Obtained an order for the costs payable to be reduced on the basis of the receiving party’s delay in commencing taxation proceedings.

Re KCY  

Acted for the receiving party in taxation proceedings

HKSAR v WKYH

Acted for the receiving party in taxation proceedings arising from the Defendant’s acquittal in a criminal case in the District Court

 

Defamation

Chan Kwing Chiu and anor. v Chan Chi Kau (CACV 209/2012)

Acted for Plaintiffs in a defamation action in respect of owners’ committee disputes. Successful appeal against Defendant’s counterclaim (led by Mr. Lawrence Ng)

Yu Sau Ning Homer v Wong Wan Keung and ors. [2020] HKDC 40; CAMP 111/2020

Acted for the Plaintiff in a 17-day trial of a defamation action in respect of articles alleging wrongdoings of the Plaintiff during his role as the Chairman of the Incorporated Owners (led by Mr. Lawrence Ng). The Court ruled in favour of the Plaintiff and awarded damages of HK$1,000,000. The 2^nd and 3^rd Defendants’ application for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeal was dismissed.

Dr. Chan Hin Keung Henry v Apple Daily Limited and ors. (CACV 100/2015; DCCJ 1474/2013)

Acted for the Plaintiff in a defamation action in respect of newspaper articles alleging involvement of Plaintiff in pyramid sales activities (led by Mr. Lawrence Ng)

Noble Group Limited v Arnaud Vagner and another (HCA 594/2015)

Acted for the Defendants in an action regarding conspiracy to use unlawful means and conspiracy to injure via publication of articles online (led by Mr. Lawrence Ng)

Korean International School and ors v Lee Kyung Ok and anor (HCA 2910/2017)

Acted for the Plaintiffs in a defamation action in respect of articles alleging wrongdoings of the Korean International School, Korean Residents Association and the Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Korean International School

Lee Fung Sin v Hui Tat Hung, Allan (DCCJ 5351/2017)

Acted for the Plaintiff in a defamation action regarding an article circulated to members of an interest group

Li Kui Hing v Tsang Suet Fong (DCCJ 4011/2017)

Acted for the Defendant in a defamation action regarding messages circulated in a discussion group of a shopping arcade

Re CHHS (DCCJ 1521/2015)

Acted for the Plaintiff in a defamation action regarding dispute in a local university.

 

Employment Disputes

Ines Yip v Rayben International Holdings Limited (HCA 1010/2018)

Acting for the defendant in claim by former CEO regarding summary dismissal

Ralf Schmidtke v Schmid China Limited (HCA 2458/2017)

Acting for the defendant in claim regarding outstanding salaries and rental allowance

Re Gold Field Property Agency Limited (DCCJ 4849/2014)
Obtained injunctive relief for a real estate agency against former employees who were in breach of their employment contracts

 

Intellectual Property

Re Hivi Co Ltd

Acted for the Owners in Trademark Revocation Application

Re Real Estate Agencies General Association

Passing Off action. Successfully sought relief from the Companies Registry which ordered the company name of another company to be changed.

 

Judicial Review

Re B (HCAL 31/2014)

Acted for the Applicant “B” and sought leave for judicial review against the Takeovers and Mergers Panel of the Securities and Futures Commission

Re Takeovers and Mergers Panel of the Securities and Futures Commission   (HCAL 31/2014)

Acted for the applicant in seeking urgent relief against timetabling decision of the Takeovers and Mergers Panel of the Securities and Futures Commission

 

Land Disputes

Lam Ka Kui v Choi Yuen Ling [2020] HKCFI 2647

Acted for the Plaintiff in a claim regarding the beneficial ownership of a residential property. The Court ruled in favour of the Plaintiff and granted judgment for the Plaintiff/ dismissed the Defendant’s counterclaim after trial.

Hau Gay Yau v Wong Muk Din (CACV 15/2014; DCCJ 1052/2010)

Acted for the Plaintiff in dispute over recovery of land. Successful appeal in Court of Appeal against judgment in the District Court.

Ego Finance Limited v Cham Kin Man [2018] 3 HKLRD 341;[2018] HKDC 741

Acted for the Plaintiff and obtained an order for sale of a property. The Court ruled in favour of the Plaintiff on both legal issues before the Court.

Re Central Southwood Limited [2018] HKDC 1447

Acted for the 2^nd Defendant in dispute over an alleged common intention constructive trust over a property. The Court ruled in favour of the 2^nd Defendant and dismissed the claims of the Plaintiffs after trial.

Re The Shek O Development Company Limited  [2017] 2 HKLRD 374

Acting for various defendants in claims for adverse possession of various properties at Shek O Village

Ng Hing Yau, Pakco Property Services Limited v Kong Art Limited (HCA 1367/2016)

Acted for the Plaintiffs in seeking injunctive relief against ex-manager of a shopping arcade

Kingfield Investment Limited v Pakco Property Services Limited, Ng Hing Yau (HCA 1536/2016)

Acted for the Defendants in dispute over common facilities of a shopping arcade (led by Mr. Raymond Tsui).

Kingfield Investment Limited v Pakco Property Services Limited, Ng Hing Yau (HCA 1536/2016)

Acted for the Defendants in injunction application regarding air-conditioning facilities of a shopping arcade (led by Mr. CY Li SC).

Re The Shek O Development Company Limited (HCMPs 1793, 1794, 1797/2000)

Acting for various defendants in claims for adverse possession of various properties at Shek O Village

Wong Wing Keung v The Incorporated Owners of Kwong Wing Building (Mong Kok Road) (DCMP 1449/2018)

Acting for the Plaintiff in a claim for adverse possession of a stall

Yeung Kwai Chuen and another v Yeung Kwai Yau and others  (HCMP 321/2018)

Acted for the Plaintiffs in a striking out application by the 3^rd Defendant (in relation to the Plaintiffs’ claim for an order for sale and declaratory relief regarding a tenancy agreement) which was dismissed by the Court.

Dah Sing Bank Limited v Rich Star Investment Development Limited [2020] HKCFI 1251 

Acting for the defendants in a mortgagee action regarding recovery of properties

Ng Wing Tay v Etek Company Limited [2019] HKCFI 2902

Acted for the Plaintiff and obtained declarations for adverse possession of a property

Bhatti Bhupinder Singh v Lee Chiu Tak and ors [2020] HKDC 100

Acted for the Defendants in interlocutory injunction application regarding noise dispute between neighbours

Re LYMJ (HCMP 1901/2014)

Acting for the applicant for relief under s.8(2) of the Government Rights (Re-Entry and Vesting Remedies) ordinance

Re CWK (HCMP 2823/2013)

Acted for the Plaintiff and sought orders regarding application for adverse possession of a property

Re HK (HCA 1524/2017; DCCJ 3137/2017)

Acted for the Plaintiff in matter concerning properties held on trust

Re CST (HCA 788/2006)

Acting for the 3rd Defendant on matter concerning purchase of property

Re KKK/TOK (DCCJ 2031/2017)

Acted for the Plaintiffs in dispute over right of way and obtained an order for specific performance of terms of a settlement agreement.

Re NCS/CSK (DCCJ 694/2014)

Acting for the defendants on matter concerning registration of lis pendens

Re Palking Limited (DCCJ 4395/2016)

Acting for the Plaintiff in claim for damages arising from water leakage

Re Ego Finance Limited (DCCJ 1446/2015)

Acted for the 2^nd Defendant in land dispute

Re Incorporated Owners of San Po Kong Mansion (DCCJ 1229/2012; DCCJ 1270/2012)

Acted for the ex- Vice Chairman and Treasurer of the Incorporated Owners regarding allegations of misappropriation of funds

Re Casio Mansion (LDBM 173/2013; LDBM 213/2013)

Acted for the Applicant in respect of building management disputes

Re The State Theatre Building (LDBM 154/2015)

Acting for the Respondents in action against the Incorporated Owners and counterclaim for adverse possession

Re Hoi Hing Building (LDBM 185/2015)

Acted for the Respondent in action against the Incorporated Owners regarding water leakage

Re Shiu Fung Mansion (LDBM 341/2014)

Acted for the Respondents in action against the Incorporated Owners regarding use of alleged common area

 

Matrimonial

CSJ v CTK

Custody (led by Ms. Lisa Remedios)

TL v YSW aka WSY

Ancillary Relief (led by Ms. Lisa Remedios)

IMCL aka LMCI v FYF aka FFY

Maintenance pending suit and Ancillary Relief

WKY v CMY

Variation of maintenance

 

Personal Injuries

Re TLF (HCMP 574/2019)

Acted for the plaintiff and obtained the Court’s approval for a settlement offer pursuant to O.80 r.11 of the RHC

Re TWN

Advised the plaintiff in a High Court personal injuries action.

Re CTH

Advised the plaintiff in a High Court personal injuries action.

 

Probate

Au Susan and others v Au Kwan Yick and others (HCA 2249/2018)

Administration of estate

Wong Yuen Han v Wong Shing Chung and others (HCA 458/2013)

Administration of estate

Re Estate of PF

Validity of will, grant of probate

Re Estate of TKC

Administration of estate

Re Estate of YSK

Rectification of will

Re Estate of CWH

Revocation of Letters of Administration

Re Estate of LSK

Application for financial provision pursuant to Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependents Ordinance)

 

Shipping

Re MVE

Acted for sub charterers and guarantors in shipping arbitration proceedings (LMAA Terms 2012)

Re MVG

Acted for sub charterers and guarantors in shipping arbitration proceedings (LMAA Terms 2012)

Re MVR

Acted for sub charterers and guarantors in shipping arbitration proceedings (LMAA Terms 2012)

Re MVYXX

Acted for the Respondents in shipping arbitration proceedings (LMAA Terms 2012)

Education

LLB (Hons.)	University of Exeter
LLM	King’s College London
LLM (China Law)	Peking University
PCLL	The University of Hong Kong

Qualifications

Accredited Mediator	Centre for Effective Dispute Resolution (CEDR)
Mediator (General Panel)	Hong Kong Mediation Accreditation Association Limited (HKMAAL)
Member	Chartered Institute of Arbitrators (MCIArb)

Current Appointments

Reviewer	PCLL Conversion Examination Board
Member	Committee on Arbitration, Hong Kong Bar Association
Member	Committee on Construction Law, Hong Kong Bar Association
Member	Committee on Land, Trust and Probate, Hong Kong Bar Association
Member	Committee on Mediation, Hong Kong Bar Association

Previous Appointments

Consultant (Hong Kong Law)	Zhejiang Tengfei Jinying Law Firm, P.R.C.
Editor	China Guiding Cases Project, School of Law, University of Stanford, U.S.A.
Editor	Basic Law Landmark Cases Promotional Campaign, Hong Kong
Member	Standing Committee on Greater China Affairs(SCGCA), Hong Kong Bar Association
Member	Standing Committee on Civic Education (SCCivEd), Hong Kong Bar Association
Member	Special Committee on China Practice Development, Hong Kong Bar Association

Scholarships

Middle Temple Advocacy Scholarship

Editor	Securities Law: Hong Kong SAR and People’s Republic of China (LexisNexis)
	Halsbury’s Laws of Hong Kong – Arbitration (2012 and 2016 updates) – Bills of Exchange – Bribery, Corruption and Organized Crime – Civil Aviation – Evidence – Guarantee and Indemnity (2019, 2022, 2023 and 2024 updates) – Sale of Goods (2019, 2021 and 2024 updates) – Trade and Labour
	Halsbury’s Laws of Hong Kong Current Service – Criminal Law – Criminal Procedure – Guarantee and Indemnity – Maritime Law – Sale of Goods – Wills and Probate
	Lexis Practical Guidance – Solicitor and client costs – Taxation of costs – General Rules about costs – Types of costs orders
	Annotated Ordinances of Hong Kong – Costs in Criminal Cases Ordinance – Drug Trafficking (Recovery of Proceeds) Ordinance (2018 and 2022 updates) – Independent Commission against Corruption Ordinance – Organized and Serious Crimes Ordinance (2016, 2018 and 2022 updates) – Summary Offences Ordinance – Theft Ordinance (2016 and 2022 updates) – Trade Descriptions Ordinance (2018 and 2024 updates)
Author	“Nowhere to Hide – Directors be aware of personal liability for costs” (Hong Kong Lawyer, November 2018 issue) (co-authored with Mr. Lawrence Ng)

Fluent in Cantonese, English and Putonghua.

Commercial Crimes

Family Law

General Civil and Chancery Practice

General Crimes

Judicial Review and Public Law Matters

Mediation and ADR

Personal Injuries and Employees’ Compensation

Shipping Litigation

Email: victorlui@mkwong.com.hk

Secretary: Ms. Priscilar Lui (chambers@mkwong.com.hk)